I would argue that it isn't special rights, but equal rights.
We're not talking about poly or animals, but a union contract between two adults. In a sense it is saying that your heterosexual marriage is more valid than say James and Daniel of Rutland who have been together likely longer than either of your marriages.
Personally I could never look at Nikulai and state that he can't marry the one he loves. It hurts me to think that others could.
no subject
We're not talking about poly or animals, but a union contract between two adults. In a sense it is saying that your heterosexual marriage is more valid than say James and Daniel of Rutland who have been together likely longer than either of your marriages.
Personally I could never look at Nikulai and state that he can't marry the one he loves. It hurts me to think that others could.