chargirlgenius: (Default)
So, is there any real reason to do backstitch on boning channels, except the fact that *they* did them that way? It's not like they're under a ton of stress.

If I were doing running stitch, I could stack stitches and I'd be done with this thing by now. Oof.
chargirlgenius: (Default)
I have finally gotten around to adjusting the stays, making the back side piece more flared and lobed. It's nice. I'm very happy. In fact, I feel like I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night.

Pics under the cut )

Now I have to start thinking about order of assembly and boning. Ack! More thinking!

I was planning on going with reed, originally, but then I attended sarahbellem's boning class as CoCo. (I think I mentioned this already...) So I started thinking about cable ties. We went to Lowes tonight, but I'm not sure that what I found is the right kind. They seem wider and thinner than what she passed around class.


here are the beefiest cable ties Lowes had )

Alternatively, I'll just stick with reed and try to dig up where to buy metal for some reinforcing. I'm also debating opening and lacing them in the front, too, but that would mean making a LOT more eyelets. Meh.

Vanity

Apr. 28th, 2010 10:46 pm
chargirlgenius: (Default)
So, when and if I ever get around to making 18th century clothes, do they all have to be ankle length? I've been looking mostly at extant stuff, so I have no idea how long it would be on somebody.

I'm vain, and I've always preferred floor-length to make me look longer than wider. Ok, so I know if I add the bum roll thingies and maybe pocket hoops and all of that I'll be plenty wide, but y'know what I mean?

In other news, 29 lbs of tropical weight wool arrived today. Woo! The cranberry is a little too stretchy to be the 100% that it's advertised as, and the houndstooth is a bit too modern. So I have to think about those and what to do with them.
chargirlgenius: (Default)
Let me count the ways. :-D

He was puttering around on the laptop before dinner, and left it open when he went upstairs to change.

I saw this website up and he'd been browsing the men's section:

1750-1795 in Fashion (Wikipedia)

This is the same man who requested that I make his 15th century points red and yellow spirals, because they'd be more blingey that way. I guess he *is* the one who first suggested that we do 18th century.

AND he can fix cars and cut down trees. *smooches*

[livejournal.com profile] demode has a fabulous directory of extant women's clothing from 1600-1919. I've been browsing and drooling. Does anybody know of a similar list for men?

Profile

chargirlgenius: (Default)
chargirlgenius

October 2011

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
1617181920 2122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios