![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Mar. 16th, 2010 09:00 amI have awesome friends.
That is all.
That is all.
How do I love my husband?
May. 8th, 2009 07:11 pmLet me count the ways. :-D
He was puttering around on the laptop before dinner, and left it open when he went upstairs to change.
I saw this website up and he'd been browsing the men's section:
1750-1795 in Fashion (Wikipedia)
This is the same man who requested that I make his 15th century points red and yellow spirals, because they'd be more blingey that way. I guess he *is* the one who first suggested that we do 18th century.
AND he can fix cars and cut down trees. *smooches*
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
demode has a fabulous directory of extant women's clothing from 1600-1919. I've been browsing and drooling. Does anybody know of a similar list for men?
He was puttering around on the laptop before dinner, and left it open when he went upstairs to change.
I saw this website up and he'd been browsing the men's section:
1750-1795 in Fashion (Wikipedia)
This is the same man who requested that I make his 15th century points red and yellow spirals, because they'd be more blingey that way. I guess he *is* the one who first suggested that we do 18th century.
AND he can fix cars and cut down trees. *smooches*
demode has a fabulous directory of extant women's clothing from 1600-1919. I've been browsing and drooling. Does anybody know of a similar list for men?Many people have suggested a particular solution to the same-sex marriage conundrum. They would have the government recognize civil unions of everybody, and leave marriages to the church. This allows marriage to remain a religious institution, but allows everybody the exact same civil rights.
Only, I'm not really so keen on it.
You see, we were married in a civil ceremony, and that's the only ceremony we had, and likely the only one that we ever will have. I'm not any less "married" than the rest of you, and yes, I WANT to use the word "married". I'm also a religious person, and I know that in the eyes of God I am married.
Marriage is a human condition, not a religious one. Marriage is not something that only religious people have done. Marriage has always been considered a contract, and it wasn't even until the 12th century that the Catholic Church made it a sacrament. In the early Christian era, the presence of clergy was not required to make a partnership a marriage, even in the eyes of God.
I understand the idea of leaving government out of marriage, and once liked it. But it's not historically correct (at least from a Euro-centric perspective). Government has MORE business in the process of marriage than the churches. Once you were married, THEN you were subject to whatever expectations put were upon you by your church.
There's no reason to overhaul the whole system. There's no reason to make a complicated new set of laws to create a separate but equal condition. Use the laws we already have, and give people equal access and protections under those laws. Simply put, two people who love each other should have the ability to MARRY. Period, end of story.
Only, I'm not really so keen on it.
You see, we were married in a civil ceremony, and that's the only ceremony we had, and likely the only one that we ever will have. I'm not any less "married" than the rest of you, and yes, I WANT to use the word "married". I'm also a religious person, and I know that in the eyes of God I am married.
Marriage is a human condition, not a religious one. Marriage is not something that only religious people have done. Marriage has always been considered a contract, and it wasn't even until the 12th century that the Catholic Church made it a sacrament. In the early Christian era, the presence of clergy was not required to make a partnership a marriage, even in the eyes of God.
I understand the idea of leaving government out of marriage, and once liked it. But it's not historically correct (at least from a Euro-centric perspective). Government has MORE business in the process of marriage than the churches. Once you were married, THEN you were subject to whatever expectations put were upon you by your church.
There's no reason to overhaul the whole system. There's no reason to make a complicated new set of laws to create a separate but equal condition. Use the laws we already have, and give people equal access and protections under those laws. Simply put, two people who love each other should have the ability to MARRY. Period, end of story.
